The Family Justice Reform panel has released its second consultation paper which examines the 2014 family justice reforms. The panel’s research has shown that for those who have engaged in FDR, it can be a ‘quick, affordable and effective process’. They therefore want to promote a higher level of participation in FDR.
Proposals contained in the report include:
• FDR should be available at the most appropriate time for parents, caregivers and their whānau, whether or not an application to court has been made
• where an application to court has been made but FDR not undertaken, the matter be referred to FDR, unless good reasons are given not to (rebuttable presumption)
• a clear process is outlined in the rules for the court to make direct referrals, addressing timeframes and how outcomes are reported back to the court (while keeping the ability for parties to abandon proceedings, if appropriate).
The report also highlights the need for more to be done to empower Māori in the justice system and to enable whānau to resolve family disputes in a culturally safe and appropriate way.
Emphasis is also given by the panel on the importance of participation of children in the justice system. Our Voice of the Child service gives the opportunity for children to be heard and have their voice represented in the FDR process.
Read the report in full here
Find out more about our FDR process here
PENALTIES AND CHILD SUPPORT – WHAT THE NEW LAW MEANS FOR YOU
By Nashi Ali and Melissa Perkin. The child support scheme affects approximately 135,000 carers, 166,000 liable parents and 185,000 qualifying children. In 2019 it was reported that there was $2.2 billion in child support debt. A crippling $1.6 billion of this debt was...
FAQ’S – PENALTIES AND CHILD SUPPORT – WHAT THE 2021 LAW CHANGES MEAN
Following the 2021 changes to child support laws, there are potentially significant changes to the way liable parents are now exposed to penalties under the child support regime. We have created a series of FAQs with answers to help understand the changes. When do the...
Preston v Preston “…this case is everything relationship property litigation should not be.”
By Melissa Perkin and Melt Strydom. Overview Mr and Mrs Preston were married for five years. Sadly, the legal proceedings that followed their separation have lasted almost as long and might not be over yet, as an application for leave to appeal was recently filed in...